सोमवार, १ सप्टेंबर, २०१४

Dominance and Transition of Caste Politics: A case study of Maharastra

     
Background:

                               The state of   Maharashtra is one of the progressive states in India because of its different identity. Most of the social and political movements had   started from this state. In modern times Justice M.G.Ranade ,  social reformer  Mahatma Jotiba Phule   gave  new shape to this state.  Dr. B.R. Ambedkar also started his social and political movements from this state.  He also criticized the social structure of Hindu Religion and find out caste based authoritarianism and political power. Gail Omvedt took the review of caste politics and she concludes that this phenomenon was a cultural revolt against Brahman power.   Thus the state of Maharashtra has getting different type of identity.

                           The voting politics started after the reforms by the act of 1935 in British period and for first time peoples got the opportunity to cast their votes. This process spread after the independence and the power transferred from upper caste to the middle caste. Now presently the “Maratha ‘’ caste is dominating on the politics and other backward classes (OBC’s) are mobilizing against the establishment.  The study of this scenario is very interesting so the researcher have chosen this topic for the presentation.

 1930-1960:

            The Indian National Congress actively participated in the election after the Reforms of Act 1935. This election was held in 1937 and first time the state assemblies established in nine provinces. Mumbai was one of the provenience where the Indian National Congress dominating. Within the Congress party there were two major groups actively involved in election process. One group was form under leadership of Shankarrao Dev and second group was trying to capture power under the banner of Non-Brahmin movement. Keshavrao Jedhe,  Bhaushaeb Hire were the leaders of this second group. The Brahmin group was so strong due to its background of upper caste and monopoly in knowledge field. British education was accepted by this group so they dominated in each and every filed. Lokmanya   Tilak, Gopalkrishana  Gokhale  had lead the mass movement on the  national level . On the same time the Non-Brahmin’s leaders were away from Congress movement and the leader like Mahatma Phule had boycotted on the national movement. Mahama  Phule was advocate of  social movement  and  started the  movement against social exploitation by Brahimns and   mobilized  Non- Brahmin castes against them. Phule established the ‘Satyashodhak Samaj’and further ‘Non-Brahmin’ movements. These new forces were parallel to the Indian national movement.

            The Satyashodhak Samaj and Non-Brahmin movement got the support from the masses.  This   movement motivated by Chhtrapati Shahu Maharaj in Kolhapur and,  Mahama Phule was  lead the movement in Pune.  So the movement became powerful   in the state. Keshavrao Jedhe and Dinkarrao Javalkar these leaders were   lead this movement in other parts of state.  This new group was deadly against group of  Tilak and their followers too. The Non-Brahmin groups were kept distance from freedom struggle movement. After Tilak, Mahatma Gandhi lead the   freedom struggle movement and Non- Brahmin groups attached with Indian National Congress. The social reformer Vittal Ramaji  Shinde took the efforts and incentive   for new a alignment.  Mahatma Gandhi also wanted the groups of farmers and workers should merge in the main stream. According to that Kakasaheb Gadgil   took the efforts and he appealed those leaders of Non- Brahmin movement engaging  in the Congress party. In 1920 the Non-Brahmin leaders like Keshavrao Jedhe discussed this matter with Mahatma Gandhi in Jedhe Mansion. Gandhi appealed to these leaders to join Indian National Congress. The leaders of Non- Brahmin accepted this request and they decided to join with Congress. Jedhe made the campaign and he appealed that Maratha community to come forward for cooperation with the Congress party. Large Maratha community had entered in the Congress party. In future, Keshavrao Jedhe gave the opportunity to other leaders like Shankarao More, Bhausaheb Hire, Tulshidas Jadhav and Yashwantrao Chavan to lead the Maratha community and congress party.  

             Right to vote was spread after the act 1935 in the British Raj. The first elected government established in 1937 and the power race was started in between Brahmin and Non-Brahmin leaders. The sizeable figure of Maratha and   Non-Brahmin voters were larger than Brahmin’s. So the establishment of Maratha- Non-Brahmin in the power was unavoidable. In Bombay state the congress party divided in two major groups namely Dev and Jedhe . Shankrao Dev, T. R.Devgirikar, B. G. Kher were  one side and  Keshavrao Jedhe, Shankrao  More, Tulsidas Jadav, Bhaushaeb Hire these Maratha leaders for  another side. Dev- Devgirikar group had more influence on state regional Congress and this group supported to the B.J.Kher and Morarji Deasi for their Chief Ministership in the Bombay state. Jedhe became state Congress chief and he felt that he had been neglected and insulted by the Brahiman’s leaders like Dev-Devgirikar. Within the party Jedhe supported to interest of farmers and workers. And he wanted to mobilize this politics in interest of Congress. Also he criticized politics of “Shetji-Bhatji”.  To overcome this problem, Jedhe formulated Peasants-Workers new group writhen the Congress. This new move was  opposed by Shankrrao Dev who was the General Secretary of Indian National Congress.Dev himself utilized his position and he banned  the group formulated by Jedhe. Jedhe realized that the Maratha interest will be not protected in the party and he decided to form “Peasent Worker Party” (PWP) in political interest of Non-Brahmin groups and openly oppose to politics of “Shetji- Bhataji”. This decision affected on Congress party and some Maratha leaders were agreed with stand of Jedhe. Withen the Congress party they wanted to develop their Maratha politics. Yashwantrao Chavan realized the wrong stand of Jedhe and he decided to remain with Congress. Chavan wanted to develop their group with support from Maratha- Kunbi, farmers and it was possible because of voter’s strength of Non-Brahimins. Yashwantrao Chavan advised to Jedhe for remain with congress however Jedhe decided to form new political party. Other Maratha leader like Bhaushaeb Raut, Shankarrao More,  Tulsidas Jadav  supported to Jedhe for  formulation and establishment of Peasant Worker Party and they were join in the  new party. The middle leaders involved in PWP and they challenged to State Congress leaderships. The new party got the support from masses and Congress party lost the base from rural area. The vacuum is created in the Congress due to formation of PWP. Congress party learned a lesson from new political formation and party promoted other Maratha leaders who where remain with Congress. Yashwantrao Chavan and Bhausheeb Hire got the opportunity to lead the party in the state. Hire became a president and Chavan worked as secretary for regional congress party.  Chavan had successfully made efforts for strengthen the regional congress   and he prepared his own influence writhen and outside the party.  He made the social and political engineering in the state in period of 1950-1960 when the main opposition parties were mobilize the masses   on the issue of Bombay with Maharashtra. With hard work and co-ordination, he patiently handled the various groups writhen and outside the party so relations with opposition parties were not a problem for him. He was the successor of  Morarji Desai after 1954 in the Congress. In 1960 the state of Maharashtra was establish after long struggle by all opposition parties and credit went to Chavan due to his political diplomacy. After 1960 Yashwantrao Chavan accepted the policies of development and welfare state and he implemented the development scheme for the farmers and villages. He adopted “Agro- Industry “model for the development of rural Maharashtra. He promoted the Co-operative movement for the agriculture and economic sector of rural area of state. The Co-operative sugar mills started this time which became the main magnificent force latter 1960 in the state politics. Through the Co-operative sector the Congress party had got the political base in Maratha and Non- Brahmins votes. In the centre and state the Congress party was in the power and this combine power supported to Co-operative movement and automatically this sector got the financial support from the state. The ultimate result was the spread of Co-operative movement and the vote bank of Congress. By this way the face of rural Maharashtra changed and   Non-Brahmin and Maratha’s were become the actual rulers for the state. The major development took place and middle farmer became the Co-operative industrialist and they were main supporters for the Congress party.  Namely, Yashwantrao Mohite,  Tatyasaheb Kore,  Balasaheb Vike-Patil, Vasantraodada Patil,  Karmvir Wagh,  these leaders came  forward from  Co-operative politics. The Co-operative institutions provided the base for mobilization of votes in interest of   Congress. And this new group also shared the power in local self government.   

                 The Congress government accepted the decentralization of power through Panchayat raj. The model was developed by Vasantrao Naik who became Chief Minister of Maharashtra in 1963. This model was of three tires which gave the political enhancement to Congress party in the state. This model gave the lot of contribution   in development of rural part of the state and also gave training to the political workers. Political workers and leaders got the participation in power and some of them successfully lead in the state politics.  Rural Maratha elite leaders groups he got good opportunity to make the career in the state politics. Yashwantrao Chavan gave the more concentration on the development of rural Maharashtra and he himself established his leaderships in the state. In interest of education and the social development Maratha leadership started new Universities in various parts of the state. Most of the Maratha leaders opened colleges and schools for their educational and social interest. The farmer sons got the EBC facility for completion of their education from primary to higher education so many schools and colleges opened for providing the education. Presently, the education sector is under the control of Maratha leaderships and Government of Maharashtra is providing the salary of the teachers. By this way the monopoly of Brahmin community declined and Maratha community entered in the area of politics and education. Maratha got higher position in other area like administration, education. The first phase of this scenario began from 1930 and continued in 1980.

              After capturing the power, Yashwantrao Chavan made various changes in Maharashtra Regional Congress committee. Malojiraje Naik Nimbalkar became the President of MPCC instead of Devgirikar. Yashwantrao Chavan played the card of Mararatha and he invited the other Maratha leaders for a development of Non-Brahmin community. And he also gave the sharing to these leaders in the power. The several Maratha leaders from PWP joined in the congress party and they became the part of Power. Most of them got the licenses for starting the Co-operative sugar mills in their areas. The founders of PWP like Keshavrao Jedhe, Tulshidas Jadav, joined to the Congress party in 1962.  The most of the Maratha leaders preferred the stand of Yashwantrao Chavan and they entered in the congress party. Once again Congress party got the support from Maratha other Non-Brahmins castes. In 1936 the Brahmin leaders were dominated on the party and after 1960 Martha leaders took the charge of the state politics.

        The opposition parties like Communist, Jansangh,  Socialist under the control of Brahmin leaders like S.A, Dange , Rambhau Mahalgi, S.M. Joshi respectively but they were not getting the support from the masses. They had their political base in urban part of the state like Mumbai, Pune , Nashik  and other urban part of Maharashtra. This social structure became the base for Congress party till 1977. In 1977 the emergence of Janata Party in center was major setback to Congress party because this party won 28 seats out of 48 in Maharashtra. Most of the Congress leaders in region Mumbai, Pune, Konkan, Marathwada and Vidarbha lost the election and some of them joined new Janata Party after declaration of election result. The Dalit party like RPI did not get big support from the masses and most Dalit leaders preferred to join the hands with Congress party under the Maratha leadership. Yashwantrao Chavan gave them minor sharing in the power.  And most of Dalit leaders were happy with the Congress party. Within twenty five years the Maratha reached at highest level of power from a support of Kunbi and Dalit. And state politics had   got a proper face of Non- Brahmin leadership.

            In first phase of these transitions, the print media did not believe on the new changes.Some editor’s criticized on the capacity and abilities of Maratha leadership. But new Maratha leaders proved their capacities, abilities and vision for the development. These leaderships commanded on the administration and in politics. Yashwantrao Chavan,  Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh, Annasaheb  Shinde, Vasantraodada Patil, Shankarao Chavan, Rajarambapu Patil, Bhausaheb Hire, Madhukarao Chuodhari these leaders were came forward for the leadership and they proved their abilities and capacities in politics of  Maharashtra. 

           The social structure of Maharashtra consisted major two layers one is upper caste and second lower caste. Brahmin’s and Maratha’s are belonging to upper castes however Kunbi and Dalit are lower caste. Maratha means landlord and having a local power. Kunbi are second in Maratha but they have no background of land, and most of the  them depends upon landlords Maratha’s. This difference closed dawn in the process of politics of Non- Brahmins. Kunbi’s supported to Martha for capturing the power from upper caste. In Maratha history Chh. Shivaji had made efforts to mobilize the all Maratha and Kunbi under one umbrella of Maratharaj. This pattern was suitable to Congress leaders for getting support from Kunbi. Marathwada,Konkan, Vidrbha, Western Mahrashtra,  Khandesh  and Baglan these are main parts of Maharashtra by local language   where Kunbi’s population is very high then  Maratha. Nearly, 40% Kunbi’s are staying in the various part of state which is big vote bank for the political parties. Yashwantrao Chavan realized the strength    of Kunbi population and he made the politics of“Bhaujanwad” with support of them. After all other casts like Mali, Teli Wanjari, Dhangar, Komati Aagari also covered under the politics of Bhaujanwad. Yaswantrao Chavan offered the ministerships to Kunbi’s and other OBC’s and he successfully made new structure of Bhauganwad politics under the leadership of Maratha. So Maratha got the big support from the various castes other than Brahmins. New power centers like Co-operative sugar mills and Kunbi-OBC’s votes supported to the Maratha politics.  From 1930 t0 1980 this structure had dominated on the politics of Maharashtra.

 1977 onward:

              Till 1977, the above structure was successfully implemented in the role of state but Indira Gandhi played the different parallel role and she gave set back to the established leaders. In the politics of Maharashtra, Indira Gandhi promoted other Maratha leaders who had no base from the masses. After the President election (1969) and the split in All India Congress party, Indira Gandhi was trying to give setback to Maratha leaderships. Shankarao Chavan became Chief Minister by the replacement of Vasantrao Naik who was the follower of Yashwantrao Chavan.  In 1978 election the Congress party was split in two parties one Congress (Indira) and second was Congress (Reddy). Both the parties contested the election on their party identity. And no single party had got the majority in the lower house. Janata Party and other left parties were near to majority but they did not successes to form the government. Vasantdada Patil leader of Congress (R) and Nashikrao Tirpude the leader of Congress (I) came together for the power. Ultimately, Maratha leaders and voters divided in two major groups however there were some differences but Maratha dominance had no any set back. The combine government of Congress (R) and Congress (I) collapsed after the split of Shard Pawar and his followers from Congress (R).  Shard Pawar formed new party namely Sammantar Congress and capture the power with support from Janata Party, PWP and other left parties. This experiment known as “Progressive Democratic Alliance” in the state. This government sustaining for twenty months and maintain the status of Maratha politics. After the decline of Janata party, a first time Indian politics faced midterm poll in 1980 and once again Indira Gandhi and her Congress party won the election by two-third majority in the Loksabha. Indira Gandhi dissolved the seven state assemblies including Maharashtra after capturing the power at center. Mean while the group of Vasantdada Patil  was merge in  Congress (I) and in the state election the this party  got thumbing majority in the  lower house of Maharashtra.


OBC role:

              In 80th decade   the phase of politics changed under the leadership of Shard Joshi. He   formed the farmer organization and demanded the more rates for Agriculture products.   And he started his hesitation in Vidhrabha and Marathawada regions. The first time middle farmers supported to Sharad Joshi against established Maratha leaderships. Joshi came forward from Brahmin community and handled the issues of Cotton, Sugarcane and Onion and he got the success on some issues. Sharad Pawar and Vasantdada Patil these two leaders played the politics and took the efforts for political interest. Both leaders used the skills and strategies of Yashwantrao Chavan for maintaining the vote banks of the farmers. In 1985 election, Shard Joshi supported to Sharad Pawar and Progressive Democratic Alliance against the Congress (I).But Vasantdada Patil and Congress (I) party got the victory in the election. After one year Sharad Pawar merge his poltical party in Congress (I) . Pawar mobilized middle farmers and he created a new leadership from middle farmers. To obtain the support from OBC’s he started the politics of OBC’s and demanded their demands. Before 1990, the state government started the implementation of Mandal Commission recommendations and the face of state politics was change. The state BJP unit also promoted leaders from OBC’s like Gopinath Munde (Vanjari), Anna Dange (Dhangar ) , N. S. Farande (Mali )these leaders gave the leadership for mobilizing the votes  and the Non-Brahmin image to  BJP. The BJP unit alliance with Shivsena for political gain in the state politics. After the ‘Shabanu’  case and the issue of Ram janmmabhumi in the Shivsena- BJP alliance were very assertive and made propaganda on the issue of Hindu politics. For this purpose both parties used OBC votes and their leadership. Shivsena became the state regional party and take lead on the issue of Hindu politics, got the support from the various parts of state and mostly Maratha and OBC’s leaders .in  1986, Pawar and his party was merge in  Congress (I)  and vacuum created in the state. So many Maratha leaders preferred Shivsena for their political servile. Shivsena promoted new comers Marathas and OBC’s for a new face of their party. The political picture of state changed and Shivsena- BJP alliance became new opposition party instead of Congress (S) and other left parties. In Mumbai and Konkan area Sena made the progress and BJP got the support in Vidhrabha and Marathwada regions. Mahrashtra BJP adopted same formula of OBC politics and achieved margin of votes in the state. BJP-Sena combine came in power after 1995 election and first time Non-congress government was formed under Manohar Joshi and Gopinath Munde. Joshi-Munde made the efforts against Maratha politics; however they were not successes in this task. Nearly 35% Maratha MLA belong to BJP-Sena combine and some of them from Kunbi community. Naryan Rane became Chief Minister before the general election of 2000. He had the background from Konkan area   and it was indicated that BJP-Sena combine want the correlation with Maratha dominance and this election result was not fever in respect of them. Congress- NCP captured the power in 2000 election and Maratha dominance is still continue in the state politics.  

              Sharad Powar is became the successor of Y. B. Chavan and his vision of Non-Brahmin’s politics. He offered the opportunities to Dalit and Scheduled Tribes and made the strong equitation of Maratha oriented Non- Brahmin politics. After the separation from Congress (I) he established his own Nationalist Congress party (NCP) and made efforts for to mobilized Dalit, OBC’s, and  Tribes.  Chagan Bhugbal (Mali ) Ramesh Shedge (Dhangar ) Jitendra Ahava (Vanjari ) and Madhukar Pichad ( Tribes) these leaders came forward through NCP.Pawar gave participation to them in the state cabinet. After Mandal implementation in local self government, OBC’s got the opening in state politics. Y. B Chavan prepared this idea and which was expanded by Sharad Pawar . Before Mandal the OBC’s had minimum participation in the power and after that they are dominating in local self government. OBC’s has got the separate reservation in local self government and they want to super suit Maratha politics. Maratha leaders realized the changing scenario and they had many experiences in that regards. The concept of Non-Brahmin politics has been changed and the new structure would like to create in the future. OBC’s want a separate reservation to them in the Parliament. And they have demanded through their rallies, meeting and conferences. OBC leaders want to develop their own vote bank to capturing and more participation in the power. Chagan Bhugbal from NCP and Gopinath Munde from BJP these two leaders from different parties are assertive on this issue. Both leaders would like to develop a more voice for OBC’s on the national front. Established Maratha leaders realized a new phase of politics and they want Maratha caste to be included in the OBC list. To preserving the power, they are ready to become part of OBC’s and OBC leaders are opposing to them.  If OBC leaders are success in getting the reservation in state and in parliament, it will have major change in the state. Automatically the Maratha dominated politics may be replaced by the OBC.   

            Maratha Mahasangh and NCP’s M.L.A Vinayak Mete is demanding the reservation for Maratha and also he is very assertive on this issue. He declared that Maratha and Kunbi are same so Martha should get the status of OBC and this caste should be included in the list of OBC. Maratha Mahasangh made the agitation on this issue. If Maratha caste include in the list of OBC’s, present OBC have not more participation in the power. So, all OBC’s leaders are united for opposing to stand for Maratha Mahasang and leaders behind them. The Maratha against OBC’s is the next phase in the politics of Maharashtra and it has already started after Mandal implementation in 1990.  The struggle in between Maratha and OBC’s will be very sharp in terms of votes and sharing of power.  The transition power politics were started in 1930 and this process is till continuing in second decade of 21st century. In first phase, power was transformed from Brahmin to Maratha and in second phase Martha and OBC’s are ready for the next struggle.     

 Conclusion: 

          This paper discusses on the dominance and transition of caste politics of Maharashtra and researcher reorient in summary of paper please. 

       The political and social process made a transition in politics of Maharashtra. The power transformed from Brahmin’s to Maratha and now the second transition is awaited. Political struggle in between Maratha and OBC’s will make second transition in state politics. OBC’s are mobilizing for to capture the power from Martha’s. Martha politics has the strong base from Co-operative movement and Panchyatraj system. But the Co-operative sector is under the corruption by the leaders of Martha community, so the politics will take a new phase in coming days.

       Now OBC’s are more mobilizing for capturing power on base of caste and they are ready for new political struggle. In future this political struggle will unavoidable for Martha’s and OBC’s. In politics of Maharashtra caste politics has no other alternative and this picture will continue in 21st century.


 References:

Omvedt Gail, Cultural revolt in colonial society , Mumbai , Scientific Education Trust,1976. 
Palshikar Suhas, , Jat wa  Mharashtratil  Sattakarn, Pune Sugava Prkashan, 1998.
Vora Rajendra , Maratha Varchhsav , Swarup wa Maryada,Prtima Prkashan,Pune 2007
Bhole B.L, Yashwantrao Chavan- Rajkarn wa Sahitya, Saket Prakashan, Arugabad, 2004.
Phadke Y.D, Keshavrao Jedhe, Shrividya Prakshan,Pune, 1982.


  

    
                                                 Dr. Sanjay  Ratnaparakhi
                                                 rsanjay96@hotmail.com




           

सोमवार, ४ ऑगस्ट, २०१४

A Book review on' Marxvad-Uttar Marxvad'

                        


Introduction:

   A modern political history will not be completed   without mentioning Marxism because Karl Marx gave his intellectual contributions to modern world. The 19th century was influenced by Marxism and developed a separate model of state. Former Soviet Russia was one of biggest examples of state which was built upon the Marx theory plus Lenin thoughts.   After Russian Revolution and Second World War the most of Asian and European countries adopted Marx theory for developing their own state. Before 1990 the half population of world was under the umbrella of Communist state.  Marx and his thoughts not only supported the idea of state but also gave new ideas like human freedom, equality, new version of state and culture. Before decline of Soviet Russia, there were advocacies as well as critiques on Marx theory.  The American and pro -capital media always critiqued on Communist states and Marx’s views.  After decline of Soviet Russia this critiques is going on and this process will continue. .After 1990 many Communist countries turn over from Marx theory and they adopted free economy, democracy for their new structure. The present Russia, under Putin leaderships try develops there own model on a same line.  Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan these new states are also in the same pipe line.  A China only one super power and Communist country also accepted new economic policies for sustainability of state.  Last more than twenty years the world economy and its development is going on this path. On this changing scenario the review of Marx theory is one of the requirements and it was fulfilled by well known political scientist Dr. Ashok Chusalkar with his book Marxvad-Uttar Marxvad. This book is wrote in Marathi and published by Pratima Prakashan, Pune, and March 2010.   This book devoted for Marx theory and its implication on Communist block and special reference to India and state of Maharashtra.

                                                                 I  

This book consists main three sections with thirteen chapters from Marx, human rights to review of Prof. D. K. Bedekar’s view on Gandhi thoughts and its critiques.  The section one is devoted on five chapters related with Marx ideas of freedom, views on equality, New Marxism-1 &2 and critiques on new colnynsm.  In first chapter, writer discussed on Marks ideas about rights. According to Marx, natural rights are virtual and they cannot be proved in reality. Positive rights are supported with constitution and laws of state and these rights are protected by judicial system but the implementations of rights are not satisfied. In modern age the rights are presented in two ways, i.e. liberal democratic defined rights and second views are presented by ideal political thinker where Hegel approach was important. Liberal thinkers approved equality and freedom. This system provides few rights to every citizen for his development of life. The citizen has a right of to create a wealth but very few peoples are getting successful in their business and work. Ultimately few people collect  wealth and they are controlling on the society and the power is always used  in interest of  few people and they exploit the people with the support of government so there are two classes  of the people; one who rule and second who work under them. To stop the exploitation, Marx suggested new changes through the revolution. For equality Marx suggested:

1.     Equality in physical and intellectual work.
2.     Equality in between agriculture and industry.
3.     Equality in between villages and cities.

    In the second chapter the writer focuses on Marx ideas of equality. Marx advocated of scientific socialism and promoted idea of state of working class. Marx assumed that the equality will after the formation of new state of working class and this state will work for establishing the equality in the society. For removing the exploitation and establishing the equality Marx wanted the total revolution through the working class.

    The third and fourth chapters devoted for New Marxism and its contribution to the society. The Russian revolution took place under the leadership of Lenin and after the revolution he added his own ideas according new need of Soviet Russia. After his death Stalin came in to the power and he did major changes in constitution also he gave the new shape to Russian communist party. In 1949 the communist revolution took place in China and Mao leads this revolution and called as new ‘Cultural Revolution’. After 1930 the European and U.S scholars started the study of Marxism and they contributed to Marxist theory. The Trotsky and his followers were under the influence of new Marxism. The Grimace, Lukach and Goldman were also under the influence of New Marxism. The Frankfurt school and its thinkers gave their contributions to develop New Marxism. These all aspects of New Marxism were covered in these two chapters. The writer concludes that the movement of New Marxism is going on in Europe and U.S. But not a popularized and actual theory and thoughts were not implemented.

                                                              II

    The second section discussed on system of Soviet Russia, political thoughts of Mao, differences between China and Russia and the reforms of Gorbachev and declined of U.S.S.R. These two chapters are very important because they discussed on major role of Russia and China in respect implementation of Marx theory. In respect of Russia the writers took review from Lenin to Gorbachev and their new changes. The Russian revolution took place in 1917 and that time Russia was not major industrial country like U.K or Germany. Lenin and his followers mobilized the farmers and they toppled Zar and its establishment. Lenin formed new system as socialist state. After Lenin’s death the Stalin came forward in the power and he gave the shape to U.S.S.R. and after Second World War Russia became the super power under his leadership. Within   his time,  he promoted industrial development in Soviet Russia also he made the major changes in the U.S.S.R constitution. In 1952 he wrote separate book on economic rules for U.S.S.R and developed it through the planning. Stalin did the contribution industrial development of Russia and he gave his support for revolution in east Europe and China. During his period the democracy was removed from U.S.S.R After Stalin Khruchev came in the power and he fallowed the same root of Stalin. The few changes took place in his time. After the Khruchev , Brezhnev came in the power and he did major changes in  Soviet state constitute and declared that the class struggle is over in Russia  and U.S.S.R became the socialist state. During the Brezhnev time U.S.S.R. was leading as the leader of Communist World and played major role in Cold War. After the death of Brezhnev, Gorbachev led U.S.S.R in the World Politics.  Gorbachev realized the real economic picture of U.S.S.R and he gave new structuring to Soviet economy under the new programme of ‘Perestroika and Glasnost’. He wanted a new face for socialist democracy through new economy restructuring polices. Unfourtunally, Gorbochev ideas were not successful and Soviet Russia was split in the new several independent states. Before that merging of Germany was taken place and many communist courtiers changed their structure and they adopted democracy and capitalism.

The writers also discussed Mao thoughts and its implementations in China. In 1949 the Mao led the revolution in China and established new Communist state in Asia. Now the China is the super power and dominated in the World politics.  Mao was the followers of Marx, Angles, and Lenin and also he contributed his ideas for developing Communist state and he developed China with help of farmers and workers. Mao wanted a new man and ideal society through the China revolution. Soviet Russia gave the support to new Communist China and tried to coordinate with them. This cooperation was sustain till 1971 and after that China was openly criticized Russian policies and tried to go close with U.S. China made the essential changes in policies. The crises between Russia and China came out for following reasons:

1.     Intellectual crises with Russia.
2.     China criticized on development of Russia and its parameters.
3.     Soviet dominations and third world concept.
4.     Border issue between China and Russia.
5.     1962 war between China and India
6.     Cuba problem


        All above aspects and their reasons were discussed by the writer and he highlighted that socialist courtiers made the changes but they were not properly handle an internal opposition of their societies with democratic manners.

                                                                 III

   The third section of the book has been devoted for Marx and India, Democratic socialism, Marxit thoughts in Maharashtra, Rising of Peasant and worker party, Dabhadee Thesis, Lal nishan party, Split in communist movement, Contribution of D.K Bedekar and Damodar Kosanbi. This third section of this book reviews of communist movement in India and Maharashtra. The writer also touches contributions of Pandit Nehru, M.N.Roy, Jaypraksh Naryan, and Dr.Rammnohar  Lohiya. The state of Maharashtra also contributed in development Marx theory in 19th century with social and political movements. The establishment of Communist party by S. A. Dange and his personal contribution through the books like Gandhi verses Lenin.  The writer mentioned the contributions of Dinkarrao Javalkar,  Shankarao Javdekar,  Laxmanshastri Joshi, and Shard Patil.  The rising of Peasant workers party (PWP) and its background and Dabhadi Thesis were mentioned in the book. Prof. Damodar Kosanbi and Prof. D.K.Bedekar gave their separate contributions on Marx theory and its thoughts. By this way the writer Prof. Chousalkar takes the review of Marxvad and Uttar Marxvad. This book is published in Marathi so Marathi readers and scholars will access knowledge and information on Marx theory.  

                                                                                            Dr. Sanjay Ratnaparakhi


Article Review on ‘Political Leadership’ – Ramchandra Guha





    The political process and socialization of Indian society had been started in British Raj through the social, political and economical changes. The British system brought some changes and gave new shape to the Indian society. The establishment of Indian National Congress in 1885 was the bench mark in political history of India.  Last more than two hundred years political socialization and participation of Indian society is going on towards new phase and it became a part of the global society. Our system consist so many aspects like caste, creed, upper, lower, Hindu, Non-Hindu,  Left, Right, Congress, BJP, Communist and Non- Communist. These all aspects are actually strength of our system because they play crucial role in the political process. Every election time, one of the above aspects gives his major contribution to the system.  And truly this system was developed by political parties, leaders, and workers. Also political scantiest, thinkers, and critiques gave their contributions to the political system.

     The Oxford University Press published one volume on all above aspects and tries to evaluate the political process with help of political thinkers, writers and critiques in 2010. This volume published under the title The Oxford Companion on Politics of India edited by Niraja Gopal Jayal and Pratap Bhanu Mehhta.  This book made the historical contributions to our political system. The book consist main eight parts from the Institutional setting to Ways looking at Indian Politics.  The Part-III of the book is Political process who discussed on Politics and Culture, Political Mobilization, Political Leadership, and Local Politics. After reviewing this part, I have chosen the article of Ramchandra Guha’s on a ‘Political leadership’.

    Ramchandra Guha is well-known as historian and contemporary political writer.  He wrote several books, like, India after Gandhi, India before Gandhi, Makers of Modern India.  In this book, Ramchandra Guha focuses on various aspects and issues Indian Political leadership. He took the review of Indian Leadership from first general election 1952. First general election contested in between Congres and Non-Congress parties. The Congress party faced the election under the leadership of Pandit Nehru. Non-Congress parties like, Socalist, Communist, Ramrajya Parishad and Jan Sangh played the opposite role agniest Congress.   The Congress party won the election with thumbing majority in the  Loksabha. After the election, Socalist party was split in between several groups. In this election each party had charismatic leaders like,  B. R. Ambedkar, Jayprakash Narayan, J.B. Krupalani, and Shyamaprasad Mookerjee. But Indian voters gave their support to Congress and Pandit Nehru.  The Congress party and Nehru had a background of freedom struggle and after independent Nehru led the country as Prime Minister of  interim government.  The writer noted that Nehru also thought in terms of programme and plan; the Planning Commission was never more important than in his day. All in all he was a political leader whose style can perhaps be described as ‘national –constitutionalist’. On the other hand, the style of India’s other long –serving Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi is more accurately described as ‘national populist’. Like Nehru, she took as their theatre of operation the country as whole- notably; she led the Congress party to victory in three general elections. However, she paid far less respect to the formal institutions of constitutional democracy. Indira Gandhi’s time PMO office was dominated on other constitutional bodies.  The writer also touched to other populist leaders like Sheikh Abdulla from J&K, C, N.Annadurai from state of Tamil Nadu, Master Tara Singh from Punjab. And he noted that these leaders came forward from their regions and identities of language. Later on the leadership of M.G.Ramchandran in Tamil Nadu and N.T.Ramarao from A.P established in their own states from film industry.  The writer noted that E.M.S. Naboodripad and Jyoti Basu came in to the power from communist background and they are essentially ‘regional’ leaders and successes to establish in their states.

     According to Guha, after independence B.J.P. is most successful party on the base religion and he took the review more focused on growth of B.JP. Before the BJP, Jan Sangh was the party worked for Hindu politics under guidance of Rashtriya Swaymsewak Sangh (RSS).Before 1977; Jan Sangh had limited scope in the national politics. In emergency time the Jan Sangh leaders were arrested along with Socalist leaders.  The Jan Sangh was merging in the  Janata party and first time this group won the victory in Ninety seats in the north region and party turns in to new phase of national politics. The Janata party was split on the problem of dual membership of Jan Sangh leaders. Jan Sangh leaders had background of RSS and they wanted to continue with them. Finally, Socalist and left leaders opposed to Jan Sangh leaders and lastly Janata govt.was collapse in the center in 1979. After that Jan Sangh leaders came out from Janata Party and established new party as  Bhartiya Janata Party in 1980. The BJP faced 1984 general election after Indira Gandhi’s tragic death but not successes. All party leaders were lost the election. The BJP got the growth after the decision of Supreme Court on Shabanu case and Babari Mashid problem. BJP opened Hindu card politics and got a victory in 1989 general election. The party leader L.K. Advani took ‘Rath Yatra’ from Somnath to Ayodhya and he mobilized the Hindu votes and politics. After 1991 election BJP became the major opposite party in the national politics. BJP got the power at the Center with the help of other Non-Congress parties in 1996 after that 1998 onwards. BJP government was sustaining up to 2004 under the leadership of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. A BJP and its alliance NDA was not successful in 2009 general election.

     This article also discussed on OBCs and jati-varna politics of India. In the 1950, B.R.Ambedkar tried to build a political platform for Dalit; in the 1960 the Socalist leader Dr. Lohia attempted to do the same for OBCs and he got a limited success in the said efforts. After implementation Mandal Commission report the OBC politics became the valuable things in the politic. A dalit leader Kanshi Ram established Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) after his death; party was led by Myawati in north region of India.  Likewise, Mulayam Singh Yadav’s Samajwadi Party and Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Rashtriya Janta Dal have projected themselves as parties that represented the interest of backward caste against the forwards.  And these two parties were successful in some limit.

    After the independence the Congress party was lost the election in 1977 only because of resistance and movement of Jayprakash Narayan. A writer also discussed this important episode in the detail.  J.P had the background of freedom fighter and founder member of Samajwadi Party. After the first election, J.P went to Sarvoday movement along with Vinobha Bhave.  In 1972, the students of Gujarat started hesitation angist the corruption and this movement spread in the state of Bihar. In 1974 this movement turns in to national movement and JP became the leader of students and youngsters. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi lost the battle in Allahabad High court. On 25th June 1975, Indira Gandhi declared the emergency and arrested to several opposition leaders including J.P.  She banned on the news papers and imposed new laws like MISSA to crush the movement of J.P.The lakes of people and political workers arrested under the MISSA. In 1977, the emergency was lifted and fresh election called. J.P toke efforts and he established new Janata Party and he became main campaigner and won the election.  The first time, Non-Congress government came in to power.

   A writer analyzed   political leadership in terms of sociology and ideology. Ideology leaders have a social base and their ideas and policies used to legitimatize his or her leadership. These type leaders spend their whole life for specific ideology and policies. Dr. B.R.Ambedkar was one of the example. And second example of M..S Golwalkar who devoted his life for Hindu rashtra. Golwalkar did not contest any election but he gave strength to Jan Sangh for his ideology. The second category of ‘charisma, where charismatic leaders are the ‘bears of specific gifts of body and mind that were considered “supernatural”. Pandit  Nehru, Indira Gandhi, these leaders were included in this category. Also he mentioned others name like Sheikh Abdulla, Bal Thackeray. Last more than sixty five years it is seen that sometimes charismatic leaders getting success in the election and some social and political movement get the important in election time.

    This article has done the good contribution on the leadership issue. But he could not touch the other problem of leadership like weakness of leadership, personality problem of leaders, a programme and agenda of leaders. These are important factors for development of any kind of political leadership which cannot be neglected.



                                                                              Dr.  Sanjay Ratnaparakhi